The Composite of Spoken and Written Speech. The Deipnosophists of “Athenaeus” as a Medium of the Invention and Documentation of Sources on Rhetoric between Fictionality and Factuality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62413/lc.2016(2).01Keywords:
rhetoric, banquet, hellenism, Epideictic speech, Greek literature, Imperial RomeAbstract
The “Deipnosophists” of Athenaeus of Naucratis are a literary work that presents us an insight into ancient rhetoric and speech from various perspectives. Being composed of fictive speeches that join the texts of ancient writings in paraphrases and citations in the conversations of the participants during a banquet, the work reveals in different layers, the composition of the work itself, the conversations, and their writings, especially the ones that focus on rhetorical topics, speech in the essential form of this piece of literature. We argue that Athenaeus invents and composes here a multimedia memory that arranges topics related to the culture of banquets in speeches that range from the factuality of historical accounts about rhetoricians to the fictional story of the event itself that nearly completely consists of speeches as praise of this kind of culture. The “Deipnosophists” of Athenaeus comprises both spoken and written aspects of ancient rhetorics and speeches that blend into each other ranging from the framing narrative of a meeting of Athenaeus who tells the story of the event to a friend, the speeches of the deipnosopshists, and the presentation of the texts of the works paraphrased and cited as speech in the banquet.
Cuvinte-cheie: retorica, banchet, elenism, vorbirea epideictică, literatura greacă, Imperiul Roman
REZUMAT
Lucrarea „Deipnospophists” de Athenaeus din Naucratis este o operă care face incursiune, din diverse perspective, în retorica antică și discurs. Fiind compusă din discursuri fictive, care sunt subsumate textelor unor scrieri antice în parafrazări și citări din conversațiile participanților unui banchet, ea dezvăluie, în diferite straturi, compoziția în sine a acestor conversații și scrieri, mai cu seamă, cele ce țin de subiecte retorice și vorbire. Autorul introduce aici o memorie multimedia care aranjează subiecte legate de cultura banchetelor în discursuri care variază de la factualitatea relatărilor istorice despre retoricieni la istorisirea fictivă a evenimentului în sine, care constă aproape în întregime din discursuri de laudă cu referire la cultura în cauză. Lucrarea dezvăluie aspecte atât orale, cât și scrise ce țin de retorica antică și discursuri care se contopesc între ele, de relatarea frapantă a unei întâlniri a lui Athenaeus, pe care acesta o face unui prieten, de prezentarea textelor lucrărilor parafrazate și citate ca discurs de banchet.
LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION
English (main text); Greek (some units of the main text)
UDC: 821.14`02:808.51
REFERENCES
Anderson, Gr. (1993). The Second Sophistic. A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. Routledge.
Anderson, Gr. (2008). Rhetoric and the Second Sophistic. In W. Dominik & J. Hall (Eds), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric (pp. 339-353). John Wiley & Sons.
Bowie, E. (2008). The Geography of the Second Sophistic. Cultural Variations. In Barbara E. Borg (Ed), Paideia. The World of the Second Sophistic (pp. 65-85). Walter de Gruyter.
Eshleman, K. (2008). Defining the Circle of Sophists. Philostratus and the Construction of the Second Sophistic. Classical Philology, 103(4), 395-413.
Jacob, Ch. (2013). The Web of Athenaeus. (Arietta Papaconstantinou. Trans.). Ed. Scott Fitzgerald Johnson. Center for Hellenic Studies with Harvard University Press. CNN. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn3:hul.ebook:CHS_JacobC. The_Web_of_Athenaeus.2013.
Johnson, W. A., Richter, D. S. (2017). Periodicity and Scope. In D. S. Richter, W. A. Johnson (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic (pp. 3-11). Oxford University Press.
Kemezis, A. (2017). Essence et Presence de la Seconde Sophistique. Narrative of Cultural Geography in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists. In P. Fleury (Ed), Perceptions of the Second Sophistic and Its Times. Regards sur la Seconde Sophistique et son Époque (pp. 3-22). University of Toronto Press.
Olson, S. D. (2018). Athenaeus' "Fragments" of Non-Fragmentary Prose Authors and their Implications”. American Journal of Philology, 139(3), 423-450.
Paulas, J. (2012). How To Read Athenaeus' Deipnosophists. American Journal of Philology, 133 (3), 403-439.
Romeri, L. (2014). Citation et Recontextualisation. Le Cas des Philosophes et des Historiens chez Athénée de Naucratis”. Kentron, 30, 17-32.
Whitmarsh, T. (2013). Beyond the Second Sophistic. Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkeley University of California Press.
Whitmarsh, T. (2017). Greece. Hellenistic and Early Imperial Continuities. In D. S. Richter, W. A. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. (pp. 11-24). Oxford University Press.
Williamson, O. M. (2013). Culinary Rhetoric and Rhetorical Cookery. Plato Was Right After All. Acta Iassyensia Comparationis, 11(1), 19-22. http:// www.literaturacomparata.ro/Site_Acta/Old/acta11/AIC_11_Williamson.pdf
Corpus
Athenaeus. The Deipnosophists. (1927). (Ch. B. Gulick, Trans.). Harvard University Press. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext %3A2008.01.0405%3Abook%3D13%3Achapter%3D92.
Athenaeus. The Deipnosophists. Or Banquet of The Learned of Athenaeus. (1854). (C.D. Yonge, Trans.). Perseus Project of Tufts University. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/ hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2013.01.0003:book=5:chapter=pos=398&highlight= rhetoric.
Digital Athenaeus. Athenaei Naucratitae Dipnosophistarum Libri 15. G. Kaibel (Ed.). Project directed by Monica Berti at the Alexander von Humboldt Chair of Digital Humanities at the University of Leipzig. http://www.digital athenaeus.org/tools/KaibelText/index.php#urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0008.tlg001.perseus-grc2:5.
Philostratus the Athenian. Vitae Sophistarum. (1871). Flavii Philostrati Opera. Vol. 2. C. L. Kayser (Ed.). Teubner. Perseus Project of Tufts University. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3atext%3a2008.01.0596.
Whitehead, D. (Ed.), Athênaios. Ἀθήναιος. (Malcolm Heath, Trans.). In Suda Online. The Stoa Consortium. https://www.cs.uky.edu/~raphael/sol/sol-cgi-bin/search.cgi.
Received: October 10, 2016 | Reviewed: November 18, 2016 | Accepted for publication: November 24, 2016
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Limbaj şi context / Speech and Context International Journal of Linguistics, Semiotics and Literary Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.