Tapping Parody for the Sake of Satire

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62413/lc.2015(2).03

Keywords:

parody, satire, stiob(like), politically-correct/germane/incorrect, transcontextualization

Abstract

After having taken a bird’s-eye view of parody as defined over the years by theorists thereof, and discussing the pros and cons of the “parody vs satire” stance, the present essay argues with D. Van Ghent (1953) and R. Chambers (2010) that parody can best be viewed as a technique. While Section 3 features “stiob” (Yurchak, 2006) as the prototype of ‘politically-correct’ parody, Section 4 takes theory out into the field by anatomizing several specimens of ‘politically-germane’ parody.

 

Cuvinte-cheie: parodie, satiră, stiob (de tip), corect politic / relevant / incorect, transcontextualizare

 

REZUMAT

După ce abordăm parodia dintr-o perspectivă generală, aşa cum a fost definită de-a lungul anilor de către teoreticienii acesteia, şi discutăm avantajele şi dezavantajele opoziţiei „parodie versus satiră”, în prezentul eseu argumentăm, bazându-ne pe concepţiile lui D. Van Ghent (1953) şi R. Chambers (2010), că parodia este, mai întâi de toate, o tehnică. În timp ce Secţiunea 3 a lucrării prezintă „stiob”-ul (Yurchak, 2006) ca prototip al parodiei „corecte din punct de vedere politic”, Secţiunea 4 dezvoltă teoria dată prin analiza mai multor exemple de parodie „relevantă din punct de vedere politic”.

 

LANGUAGES OF PUBLICATION

English (sometimes Romanian) (main text); English, German (corpus)

 

UDC: 82-225.09 

 

REFERENCES

Books and articles

Bahtin, M. (1982). Probleme de literatură şi estetică. Editura Univers.

Boyer, D., Yurchak, Al. (2010). American Stiob: Or, What Late-Socialist Aesthetics of Parody Reveal about Contemporary Political Culture in the West. Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 179-221.

Chambers, R. (2010). Parody: The Art That Plays with Art. Peter Lang Publishing.

Daiches, D. (ed.). (1971). The Penguin Companion to Literature (1). Penguin Books Ltd.

Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. PUF.

Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton University Press.

Goethe, J. W. (1980). Gedichte (A. A. Anixta, Ed.). Progress.

Golopenţia Eretescu, S. (1969). Grammaire de la parodie. CLTA (pp. 167-181).

Hutcheon, L. (1985). A Theory of Parody. Methuen.

Iacob, L. (2011). Parodia literară. Şapte rescrieri româneşti. Editura Institutul European.

Jakobson, R. (1956). Fundamentals of Language. Mouton.

Kermode, F., Hollander, J. (1973). The Oxford Anthology of English Literature (vol. 2). Oxford University Press.

Rose, M. A. (1993). Parody: Ancient, Modern, and Post-Modern. Cambridge University Press.

Shklovsky, V. (1990). Art as Device. In: Theory of Prose (B. Sher, Trans.) (pp. 1-14). Dalkey Archive.

Van Ghent, D. (1953). The English Novel: Form and Function. Harper & Row Publishing.

Yurchak, Al. (1999). Gagarin and the Rave Kids: Transforming Power, Identity and Aesthetics in the Post-Soviet Night Life. In: Consuming Russia: Popular Culture, Sex, and Society since Gorbachev (pp. 76-109) (A. Barker, Ed.). Duke University Press.

Yurchak, Al. (2006). Everything Was Forever until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton University Press.

Dictionaries

***(2002). Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. Macmillan Publishers Limited (= MEDAL, 2002).

Cuddon, J. A. (1998). Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. The Estate of J. A. Cuddon.

Schwarz, C. et al. (1990). Chambers English Dictionary. W. & R. Chambers Ltd.

 

Received: September 10, 2015 | Reviewed: September 25, 2015 | Accepted for publication: September 30, 2015

 

Google Scholar cited by

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gina Măciucă, "Ştefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania

Professor, PhD, Doctoral Thesis Advisor, author of publications indexed in WoS and Scopus, email: ginamaciuca@litere.usv.ro

Downloads

Published

04.11.2015

How to Cite

Măciucă, G. (2015). Tapping Parody for the Sake of Satire. Limbaj şi Context / Speech and Context International Journal of Linguistics, Semiotics and Literary Science, 2(7), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.62413/lc.2015(2).03

Most read articles by the same author(s)